Talk:Sue-wraith

I propose moving this page to "Sue-wraith." Have meant to do so for some time, actually. The reason is that Sues are our primary target, not authors. Even though both terms are used equally from what I can tell, I think it would be better for this more or less official document to reflect our definitely official "anti-Sue, not anti-Suethor" stance. ~Neshomeh 18:01, June 12, 2010 (UTC), sounding ridiculously formal.

Would we have to go through and replace "Author-wraith" with "Sue-wraith" or "Slash-wraith" in all our missions? Laburnum 18:29, June 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * Nah; like I said, I know Author-wraith and Sue-wraith and other variations are used pretty much equally, so that would be asking too much. I just think Sue-wraith should be the article name to emphasize the official stance here in public space. ~Neshomeh 19:20, June 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * Maybe switch it to Sue-wraith and redirect from Author-wraith, to avoid confusion? And I'm guessing it's a good idea to cut down on the use of "Author-wraith" in future missions if we're doing that. No problem there, just wanna clarify. Laburnum 19:41, June 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * Probably, though in cases of severe OOCness that isn't necessarily Sueish, "Author-wraith" might still be appropriate. And, yeah, there would be a redirect. There are probably several in place already that point to here, since there are so many variations. ~Neshomeh 20:32, June 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * Would a third "let's move it" vote count as an agreement to move the page to "Sue Wraith"? An author-wraith isn't the author; it's created by the author, just like a normal Sue. Anyway, I'm moving it, and if there are any real objections we can always just move it back.--Chaoticidealism 01:46, June 13, 2010 (UTC)