Talk:Doppelgänger Sue

I like the definition, but isn't this the same thing as one of the "Canon Sue" articles? If that's the case, we already have a page describing this phenomenon. Especially since the term "Canon Sue" is much wider known than Dopplegänger Sue.--Araeph 19:49, 15 July 2008 (CDT)

How is this definition different from that of the Imposter!Sue? I'm pretty sure those two pages could be combined. PoorCynic 18:16, April 18, 2010 (UTC)

Hmm... what about lumping them all into "character replacement"? Seems to me they're all different ways of saying that, which describes most clearly what is happening. If I ruled the world, though, I wouldn't have anyone use the term "canon!Sue" for this at all, because of the possibility of confusion with the other kind of canon!Sue. But that's just me. ~Neshomeh 17:32, April 23, 2010 (UTC)