User talk:Aster Corbett

Caddy 06:26, December 21, 2010 (UTC)Welcome
''Welcome to the PPC Wiki, Aster Corbett. Since you have edited the Sue Colour Spectrum page and created an account here, it seems you intend to stay. To avoid becoming confused and eventually insane, as so often happens, you should make certain you understand what the PPC is and the proper way to sign up before you continue on and encounter the Marquis--he does not dispense mercy and he is less tolerant of fools than I.''

''If you have not yet introduced yourself to your fellows, or even if you have, you should read the PPC Board Constitution as well as the Board's FAQ if you have any questions about their behaviors. Any incidents you cause on the PPC Posting Board will not warrant you any assistance from the Tiger Lily and the DIA or Captain Dandy and the DES; please adhere to the aforementioned Constitution, as the results when the Board's inhabitants are irritated do not bode well for anyone. Consider yourself warned. Now, if you will excuse me, I have troublesome agents to attend to.''

--- Sunflower Official (Talk) 12:34, August 23, 2010

Hey Aster! Just your friendly neighbourhood Caddy-Shack! I'm doing this because I'm going to follow you seing as you can write so fast. I'm hoping I'll be able to sponge some writing speed off of you.Caddy 06:26, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

Wiki Bloat
Although I envy your boundless enthusiasm, I am a bit concerned with your efforts to try and summarize every single installment of the Final Fantasy series. That's not what this wiki is for. They have their own wiki for that. This wiki should be focused around the agents and functions of the PPC, not the continuums they investigate Rather than summarize every game and where it fits into badfic, I would reccomend just putting in a link to the Final Fantasy wiki. See the Halo article for an example of how this might be done. -- PoorCynic 09:49, January 14, 2011 (UTC)


 * (Regarding your response on my own talk page)
 * "However, I feel it's relevant to point out how each game has shaped the fandom culture, so that information can be provided to people such as... newbies, who may want a starting place to research for missions."
 * See, though, newbies almost always stick to writing for those fandoms of which they have both a deep knowledge and fascination. They'll probably already have a pretty good understanding of how fandom is shaped because they'll have read plenty of fanfiction. Many come here with a few stories in hand that they'd like to do missions for. They're not stupid.
 * I still believe that the PPC wiki should focus around the AGENTS and the working of the PPC itself. However, that is my opinion, and you are welcome to disregard it if you wish. You're right in saying this is a community effort. Everyone should be welcome to shape the PPC wiki as they wish.
 * "Do you think it would be more effective that I cut the short summary bits out of the Game synopsis blurbs and instead leave a little link-- and then just talk about contribution to badfic?"
 * Yes, good idea. -- PoorCynic 18:49, January 14, 2011 (UTC)

Sure!
It's good to know I'm doing a good job. I'm actually just clicking the links at the bottom of the pages and seeing what I can find, but workign on stubs seems like a good idea. I'll start checking out the pages where it lists a lot of tha pages on the Wiki.Caddy 23:32, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

I'm glad Neshomeh made the Untangler page, I uploaded the pic, and was all 'oh crap wha should I write?!' I then had a minor BSOD, and decided to edit other stuff. Making the Assassin and Bad Slasher pae helps. Though a floater page wouldn't go amiss (though there sin't a fanart pic for it).

Caddy 02:34, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Hehe... I'm glad I wasn't stepping on your toes, Caddy. I guess I figured if you were going to go on with it, you would have already. And it was my idea to have those pictures in the first place, and I felt like an idiot for forgetting until now. And I love my DIC boys. ^_^

~Neshomeh 02:39, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Let's talk formatting.
I notice that we've both noticed the problem of Wikia's new layout being awful when it comes to sub-headers of level three or lower. Unfortunately, we're correcting it differently, which can only end badly. I've just been bolding sub-headers in a return to the way things looked previously, which seems to me to be slightly less complicated than underlining the headers and indenting the body text. What do you think?

Also, while I'm at it, are you aware that there are categories for images? It doesn't bother me if most people don't know or forget, since most people don't upload images very often, but since you're uploading a lot, if you'd remember to put them in the appropriate categories when uploading, it would be a relief to me. {= ) And, this is just nitpicky, I know, but it's generally "Image:Filename.tag" to place an image, not "File:Filename.tag". I'd just like to keep things consistent whenever possible, even if there's no difference in the way it's rendered.

You can reply here instead of on my page; I'll see it, and then it will be possible to read the conversation without having to go between pages. {= )

~Neshomeh 04:36, February 8, 2011 (UTC)

Durr, yes I am aware there are image categories but durr how do you sort them I would like to be able to do that durr. DX

The headers of level 3 and 4 are very similar to the body text. What I have been doing is underlining them. If it's a real section (such as a 'in badfic') I have not been indenting them, but if they are just a note I indent them. A good example would be the 'uburpble' entry on Sue Color Spectrum.

What do you think? What's the best standardization?

Aster Corbett 12:11, February 8, 2011 (UTC)

Well, like I said, the original way was that all headers were bolded, and that's definitely easier to remember than trying to sort out indents or no indents. If it were just us I think it could go either way, but for the sake of everyone, I think the simpler solution is better.

As for image categories, QED. {= )

~Neshomeh 02:16, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Cool. Also, good idea for all the onetime stub agents. :D

Aster Corbett 14:10, February 9, 2011 (UTC)